Search for: "DIVISION OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY" Results 2441 - 2460 of 3,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 3:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Since January 2009, the Department’s Civil Rights Division, working with U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm by Andy Sellars
The reasons why we afford the police a degree of deference in the field – ensuring officer safety and avoiding interference with lawful police activity – are completely absent when a journalist contacts the police's public liaison on a phone line dedicated to contact from the public. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Furthermore, the statute explicitly provided that the primary purpose of the DOC was to “enhance public safety” by incarcerating convicted offenders. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:01 pm by Kelly Damewood
“Our primary focus is always public safety and to make sure that communication is clear to the end user,” says Julie Postlethwait, the spokeswoman for MED. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:12 pm by Lindsey A. Zahn
The Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control of the Missouri Department of Public Safety denied SWSA’s application because the corporation did not satisfy the residency requirement of the state’s statute. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
 Cases are tried before an administrative law judge. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:26 pm
Indeed, such an offender could simply leave and then return without re-registering, or relocate just outside of this state's borders, thereby posing a continuing public safety threat to New York citizens situations which would effectively nullify the remedial objective of the statute. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 11:57 am
It aided her with activities of daily living as well, training her in safety-related matters. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:56 pm by Jon Gelman
“The conduct at issue in this case jeopardized the health and safety of patients and damaged the public trust,” said Attorney General Eric Holder. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 11:03 am
The Act also creates a Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders to “develop guidelines and procedures to assess the risk of a repeat offense by such sex offender and the threat posed to the public safety”. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am by Schachtman
In a recent post, Celeste Monforton, of George Washington University School of Public Health & Health Services, wrote about conflicts of interest and the recent Georgia-Pacific decision out of the First Department of the New York Appellate Division, Weitz & Luxenberg P.C. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 10:35 am
In drug conspiracy and other serious offenses, a rebuttable presumption exists that no set of conditions exists to ensure the safety of the public or the appearance of the defendant. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Legislature was far more likely to have been worried about someone scheduled to be released from State custody into the community who might threaten the public safety notwithstanding being subject to State supervision. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While the approaches taken in these other spheres are certainly helpful in identifying factors relevant to our analysis, SORA proceedings further an important and unique public safety function and we therefore decline to adopt wholesale a body of evidentiary rules developed in another context. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner)    Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and… [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 5:38 pm
The decisions by respected trial court colleagues properly reflect the exercise of discretion in these matters which all of the Appellate Divisions have referred. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In that case, the Court found that OSHA’s demand for entry onto a facility for safety inspection violated the Fourth Amendment because OSHA failed to justify its demand. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
The latter came from research by Eric Brown of FDA’s CFSAN (Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition) division (6). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:57 pm
Law Div. 2008) (internal quotation omitted), aff'd sub nom.DeBoard v. [read post]