Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 6,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2017, 5:03 am
[Citing precedents from various states] And the United States Supreme Court thus has noted that it is error to “attach[] the ‘aggravating’ label to factors that are constitutionally impermissible or totally irrelevant to the sentencing process, such as for example the race, religion, or political affiliation of the defendant …. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am
In League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
WHETHER [APPELLEE] WAS DENIED RIGHTS GRANTED TO HIM BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION WHEN INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY, IN THE FORM OF A NOTE AND EMAIL FROM [APPELLEE'S] DECEASED WIFE, WAS ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE AND USED BY THE COMMONWEALTH TO SECURE A CONVICTION ON THE CHARGE OF MURDER? [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
For example, in one year, certain Regeneron directors “were the highest compensated non-employee directors in the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:57 pm
United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945), the Supreme Court stated that the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption, regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 12:19 pm
AM GENERAL, LLC et al – United States District Court – District Court of New Jersey – August 4th, 2017) involves a claim of asbestos exposure. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Yesterday, almost two years after hearing arguments, the Supreme Court of South Carolina finally issued its decision in the case of The Protestant Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:21 pm
O’Quinn (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (finding that correctional officers who acted outside of the scope of their official duties in “hazing” a coworker still acted under color of state law); United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am
He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
That reach has included (up until Kiobel II) Chinese corporations and Russian oligarchs, irrespective of any contacts with the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 7:29 am
United States on the constitutionality of pretrial asset freezes. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
Incredulous, Live Gold objected that the State had made "a 180 degree shift in position. [read post]
