Search for: "Doe v. Doe" Results 2441 - 2460 of 152,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 7:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff wins in the Supreme Court because the deadline is not jurisdictional.The case is Harrow v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Educators are in the Unclassified Service [See Civil Service Law §35(g)] and §72 does not obtain with respect to such personnel [See Civil Service Law §6]. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Educators are in the Unclassified Service [See Civil Service Law §35(g)] and §72 does not obtain with respect to such personnel [See Civil Service Law §6]. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am by Becky (Hyun Jeong) Baek
Schecter, as recently affirmed by the First Department: “[T]he signed, amended, and restated limited partnership agreement that is dated as of October 1 of 2016 [] does utterly refute the claims that are in this complaint in every regard. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Nov 21, 2023 | Does Industry Self-Regulation of Mental Health Apps Protect Consumers? [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am by Ilya Somin
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 2:55 am by Rose Hughes
How, if at all, does the availability to a PHOSITA of AI as a tool impact:a. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
: on R (TTT) v Michaela Community Schools Trust [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin). [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]