Search for: "General Products Corp" Results 2441 - 2460 of 6,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm by Sophia Cope
We also believe that technology companies generally should not be liable for what their customers do with their products and services. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 4:27 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://thinkipstrategy.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: CAFC denies Vanderbilt’s claim to Cialis patent right: Vanderbilt University v ICOS Corporation (Patently-O) (IPBiz) Paris District Court: Basic patent for Losartan covers any product comprising Losartan: Du Pont v Mylan Losartan SPC case (EPLAW)   General WHO documents from counterfeit meeting now… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP)   Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)  PricewaterhouseCooper report – Making the intangible… [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Vincent LoTempio
Do you think an increase in the amount of patents equates to an increase of productivity? [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:03 am by Nicole Moody
In the Acuity case, Ross Glove purchased a commercial general liability policy from Acuity, which included advertising injury liability coverage. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:18 am by Alex Gasser
  The ‘134 patent relates to a memory product that includes a fixed “burst” memory, which generally allows multiple (and typically consecutive) addresses to be read using a single address. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:47 pm by Kelly
Kappos (Patent Docs) Products Aldara (Imiquimod) – US: Graceway sues FDA over generic Aldara cream decisions; alleges that petition response is contrary to basic science, common sense, and precedent (FDA Law Blog) Erbitux (Cetuximab) – UK: What is a product? [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Jan. 2, 2015), the court remanded an action brought by the Mississippi state attorney general. [read post]