Search for: "Harris v. State"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 5,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Rex Michael Engle v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 5:43 pm
As the 4th Circuit concluded in its forceful 1997 opinion in Zeran v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
The Court heard oral argument yesterday in Hertz Corporation v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:56 am
The case is styled, Turbodyne Corporation et al. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:38 am
EMI Entertainment World, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:43 am
EMI Entertainment World, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Harry Keene v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:46 am
” Prosecutorial Accountability questions “some claims made by Oregon and Louisiana” in Ramos v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:37 am
Continuing the post-game analysis of McDonald v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 8:55 am
Several states have done the same. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:51 am
Justice Harry Blackmun’s colorful majority opinion is still talked about today. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:00 am
Then President Harry S. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
Specifically at issue in the case of Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:57 am
In a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:41 am
Cir. 1991), quoting Newkirk v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 12:43 pm
” The Supreme Court held in the 1966 case of Sheppard v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 6:43 pm
Today's Ninth Circuit panel, consisting of Circuit Court Judges Harry Pregerson, Michael Hawkins, and Margaret McKeown, questioned the government and AT&T attorney extensively during oral argument. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
No home release or wristlet if mandatory 180 jail.State v Harris 439 NJ Super. 150 (App. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:58 pm
Cir. 2017);SmithKline, 439 F.3d at 1320; Harris Corp. v. [read post]