Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 2441 - 2460
of 13,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 3:29 am
" In re United Trademark Holdings, Inc., Serial No. 86836082 (June 13, 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Bergsman). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:37 am
Prior to the Rule change, the motion could be made at the time of the offer of the deposition into evidence (i.e., during the testimony period).The Board, noting its April 2016 statement regarding flexible application of the revised rules in cases pending as of the effective date of the rules, decided to construe Applicant's response to the motion to strike as a motion to re-open the period for electing and taking cross-examination of these nine witnesses. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 3:30 am
In re Masimo Corporation, Application No. 85041477 (September 30, 2013) [not precedential].According to applicant Masimo, the combination of RAINBOW and 4D is incongruous because the term 4D is not associated with the word RAINBOW. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm
And tell the guy: "We’re both Muslims. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
If you've been so busy this week that you're having kittens, here's the summary of the IP news you missed:Trade Marks and GIsHaving kittens. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
In short, they’re here to stay. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:02 am
There is in fact a compelling governmental interest in singling out this kind of false speech, i.e. hate crimes, as the government has the right to prevent public alarm and the waste of public resources predicated on false reports. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:14 am
There has to pretext plus, i.e., sexist comments or a racially-biased reduction in force. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm
There's a Section 366.26 hearing (to decides what to do with the child now that she's been removed from Mother) scheduled in the trial court for March 26, 2024 -- i.e., next week. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:59 pm
The key term "surveillance device" is defined as "an apparatus designed or adapted for use in surveillance" - i.e. a physical device rather than software. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:11 am
Asked by Hugh Hansen: "who are your [i.e. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:50 am
Applicant argued that "mixed beverages" or mixed drinks are beverages that are typically prepared by a bartender and sold on the premise: i.e., they are "mixed," and not just a combination of alcohol and fruit juice. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:46 am
To ensure that you do not miss any updates in your reader, please take a moment and re-subscribe to the new feed address (if you have not already done so): http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/feeds/posts/default Related StoriesThe wage-and-hour implications of the NLRB’s Northwestern football player rulingWhat a slick union-avoidance campaign looks likeNLRB looks to expand reach with latest enforcement priorities [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
The following is a list of the things needed to file for this process and the procedure involved in it.What You NeedPetition of disposition without administration: Three pages and notarized.Certified death certificate.If decedent has a will, then the original will has to be filed with the verified statement unless previously filed.Copy of paid funeral bill.Copy of paperwork showing decedent's assets, i.e. copy of stocks, bank statement, etc.Copy of last sixty days' medical expenses with… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 4:01 am
In re Morrison & Foerster LLP, Serial No. 85263950 (March 25, 2014) [precedential].Congressman Frank and Senator Dodd were the main contributors to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the bill was named after them. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:46 am
In re Shin-Kyu Choi, Serial No. 87386932 (June 7, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 10:53 am
Do not let on of the parties use a suicide-technique of just "sacrificing" themselves via tax lien to hurt the opposing party (i.e. do nothing just so that the parties will be hit with the liens). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:20 am
As we argue in our friend-of-the-court brief, these safeguards are not just good policy – they’re required by the First Amendment. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:32 am
In re Rabbit Hole Spirits, LLC, Serial No. 86193667 (June 11, 2015) [not precedential].Because the goods are legally identical (the goods identified in the cited registration encompass those of the application), the Board must presume that they travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers. [read post]
10 May 2022, 1:50 pm
In re Lister, 583 F.3d 1307, 1311 (Fed. [read post]
