Search for: "In re J. A. P."
Results 2441 - 2460
of 3,126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 2:50 am
Pinski Bros, Inc. 500 P.2d 945 (Mont. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:05 pm
Christopher J. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Karp, Adam P. and Julie I. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:29 am
Raise that false-positive accuracy to an absurd 99.9999% and you're still chasing 2,750 false alarms per day -- but that will inevitably raise your false negatives, and you're going to miss some of those ten real plots.So if the evaluation of Prof. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:47 pm
Mr Justice Tugendhat drew on the recent Supreme Court case In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1 (“Guardian”), from which he extracted the following principles and observations: The general principle was that cases should be held in open court, for the reasons given in R v Legal Aid Board, ex p Kaim Todner [1999] QB 966 (977 per Lord Woolf MR). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
[Boston, MA] : Aspatore Books, c2010.Immigration(RES) KF4819.3 .K87 2010Kurzban's immigration law sourcebook : a comprehensive outline and reference tool / Ira J. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
State, No. 100,666 (Sedgwick)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (petition for review)Michael P. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:11 pm
Don’t say they’re anything but — what’s the term? [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
Each is re-cast in statutory form. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:30 am
I can confidently say we're moving in a positive direction and I expect we will continue to do so. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF, Defendant, BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF, THE, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Federal jurisdiction -- Torts -- Removal of state court action to federal court -- Timeliness -- Appellate court need not decide whether defendant's notice of removal was timely in instant case because any error in failing to remand case to state court on ground that notice of removal was untimely would be procedural error and would be insufficient to warrant vacating judgment and… [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:06 am
(Rép. min. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Joshua P. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Court (In re Gonzales), 2010 U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 8:28 pm
J Food Prot. 61:318-23. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 8:28 pm
J Food Prot. 61:318-23. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm
Tams’ letter said: “The relevant passage of the judgment is to be found on p. 30 of your Court’s Judgment, in the section addressing the concept of obligations erga omnes. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:53 pm
Comment vont réagir à ces mesures les propriétaires et leurs associations, comme l’Union nationale de la propriété immobilière, déjà passablement mécontents après la diminution du montant de dépôt de garantie de deux à un mois par la loi du 8 février 2008 pour le pouvoir d’achat ? [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:23 pm
Son port touristique est le premier port de navires de croisières, avec un tiers de la flotte mondiale. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
” The judge relied heavily on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] 2 WLR 325; [2010] UKSC 1. [read post]
