Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 2:00 am
After the United States emerged from the Second World War, Congress began to focus on the organization of the executive branch. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
BYLT Performance LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:30 am
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:41 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
Commodores Entertainment Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:32 pm
Siegal’s diet and certain of his intellectual property throughout the United States and Canada in exchange for a fee and royalties. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:51 am
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
This article investigates the quirks of the Lanham Act’s Section 2(a), which provides a right-of-publicity-style ground of refusal of registration to celebrities, universities with nicknames, and international companies seeking protection of their well-known marks in the United States (where those companies are not using such marks)—and without a showing of trademark rights, use in commerce, or likelihood of confusion. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
The Court concluded, unanimously, that the decision to take a blood test and photograph the second applicant against her parents’ express instructions gave rise to an interference with her right to respect for her private life and, in particular, her right to physical integrity (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III; Y.F. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
The days that she stayed home were marked as absences. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
The appraisers valued the residential units at $70,000 and $75,000 per unit respectively. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Unite Here * Trademark Dilution Symposium Videos * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm
"Assigned to this significant forfeiture case is Chief Judge Thomas Hogan, which is captioned of United States of America v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Self of Spencer, Indiana, infringed its rights in United States Trademark Registration Numbers 1,713,815, 4,912,172, 1,705,521, 2,868,784, 1,728,274, and 4,925,141 (collectively the “IU Marks”). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:31 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1,17–18 (1966); United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 7:14 pm
" United States v. [read post]
