Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 2441 - 2460 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
The parties stipulated in January 2015 that his conviction was on appeal, but it has since been affirmed, see State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
For example, the FTC alleges (para. 18) that “1-800 Contacts claimed—inaccurately—that the mere fact that a rival’s advertisement appeared on the results page in response to a query containing a [read post]
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006,… [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:01 am by John H Curley
These were the topics addressed in a recent decision of the Appellate Court of Illinois in The City of Rockford v. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
•       State control of the fundamental means of production ( 63) legitimating/democratizing (;¶64-65)•       Highest objective: Preserving the state and Revolution (;¶66; 72)•       Central Planning  is the principal means of socialist development (6 [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 12:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“AGIS”)appeals the decision of the United States District Courtfor the Southern District of Florida in Advanced GroundInformation Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:20 pm by Ruth Levush
In his post Tariq discussed the background and findings of Carter v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am by INFORRM
  Article 1(3) of that Directive limits the field of application of the directive to activities falling with the TFEU, thereby excluding matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security). [read post]