Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 2441 - 2460 of 6,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
’” Section 9.61.260(1)(b) is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face, because it criminalizes much heated political and personal commentary of the sort that is routine when people discuss matters that outrage them. 1. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Jury trials serve the people’s right to be informed as to what occurs in their courts and reinforce the fact that the law comes from the people. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
Ferguson, segregation of public schools based solely on race was allowed by states if the facilities were “equal. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
With regard to the question whether the interference with the applicants’ rights was prescribed by law, the ECtHR notes inter alia that both applicants “were media professionals and, as such, they should have been aware of the possibility that the mass collection of data and its wholesale dissemination – pertaining to about one third of Finnish taxpayers or 1.2 million people, a number 10 to 20 times greater than that covered by any other media organisation at… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Designs can leave some people spinning aroundAlthough it is a case management decision, there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants the judgment to get wider circulation. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Designs can leave some people spinning aroundAlthough it is a case management decision, there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants the judgment to get wider circulation. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am by Fred Yarger
A plurality of the court, in the 2000 decision Mitchell v. [read post]