Search for: "State v. Clarke" Results 2441 - 2460 of 3,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2008, 8:03 am
Of course, that same instinct led him to support Franklin Roosevelt's Court-packing plan and to side with the government in Dennis v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:23 am by Mark Siesel
Clark declared: “The state, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:23 am by Mark Siesel
Clark declared: “The state, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, No. 42 MAP 2022 (Pa. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am by thelawprofessor
In that regard, it is axiomatic that “a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated” (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36] (O’Donnell J)… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
" U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 23, 2008 Clark v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]