Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 2441 - 2460 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2019, 9:11 am by Gregory Sisk
§ 2680(a) of the FTCA, the United States is protected from tort liability based on a federal employee’s exercise or failure to exercise a “discretionary function or duty … whether or not the discretion involved be abused. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Charles R. Macedo
According to the brief: "The issue raised is whether meeting the statutory requirements of Section 319 of Title 35 of the United States Code is an intangible injury-in-fact that is enough to meet the “case or controversy” requirements of Article III of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:09 am by Amy Howe
When Michaels filed his petition for review in June, the lead respondent in the case was Jeff Sessions, then the attorney general of the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm by Amy Howe
The question arose in the case of Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali Rehaif, a citizen of the United Arab Emirates, who came to the United States on a student visa but was dismissed from school – and, as a result, was no longer in the country legally. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
Citizenship and Immigration Services goes by whether the marriage is legal in the home country and then whether the marriage would be legal in the state where the petitioner lives.... [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm by Mark Walsh
Waxman for petitioner (Art Lien) When the court takes the bench, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is again absent as she recuperates from her recent lung surgery. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:10 am by Danielle D'Onfro
Shanmugam for respondent (Art Lien) The justices had just as many tough questions for Kannon Shanmugam, who argued for McCarthy, and Jonathan Bond, who argued for the United States as amicus curiae supporting McCarthy. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:03 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
”  SNB further argues that nothing in the judicial disqualification statute (28 U.S.C. section 455) or the Code of Conduct for United States Judges would require Justice Kavanaugh’s recusal. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 3:51 am
" Thus, Petitioner expressly stated that it no longer had any NAKED condoms in the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:03 am by Danielle D'Onfro
The Supreme Court reiterated this concern in its 1960 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 1:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Legal Background The relevant provision of the 21st Amendment provides: “The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:40 pm by JP Sarmiento
With the approved Immigrant Visa, our client can come to the United States immediately, and she will get her green card within two months of entry [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:39 am by Patricia Salkin
 It was possible for the petitioner to realize the benefit of increased rental units another way, despite the fact that the petitioner felt those changes would not be consistent with its marketing plan. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
Halleck (Feb. 25): Whether the private operator of a public-access television channel is a “state actor” – that is, someone who is acting on behalf of the government — who can therefore be sued for violations of the First Amendment United States v. [read post]