Search for: "U. S. v. Grant" Results 2441 - 2460 of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Ramos in Goldstein v Pikus, 2015 NY Slip Op 31455(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 20, 2015], dismissing a petition for judicial dissolution of a New York limited liability company. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am by John Elwood
  Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
ASCAP must now license both the ASCAP and BMI share and can collect for both writers, because “[u]nder the copyright law, joint authors of a single work are treated as tenants-in-common, so ‘[e]ach co-owner may thus grant a nonexclusive license to use the entire work without the consent of other co-owners, provided that the licensor accounts for and pays over to his or her co-owners their pro-rata shares of the proceeds. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Rosalind English
The judge granted the local authority’s application for summary judgment on the claim and refused the appellant’s application to extend the period of one year to bring a claim provided for in the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Johnson, Compensating Parents for the Loss of Their Nonfatally Injured Child’s Society: Extending the Notion of Consortium to the Filial Relationship, 1989 U. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:29 pm
 That is the logic of the Supreme Court's decision in CLS v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
Circuit’s 2-1 ruling granting the IFC immunity over the concurrence (really, dissent) of Judge Cornelia Pillard. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:23 pm by Thomas James
The Circuit Split The district court’s ruling was consistent with the Second Circuit’s decision in Sohn v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:59 pm
  In GRANTING the policyholder’s petition to compel and ordering Dryden Mutual to proceed with an appraisal of the homeowner insureds’ vandalism claim, Justice Rumsey held:     Notably, respondent has not [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:53 am by Tejinder Singh
He argued that under the Supreme Court’s decisions in Nollan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
However, because of "some ambiguity" in the court's prior order in regard to the receiver's authority to accept an offer structured as a stock redemption, Justice Driscoll grants the receiver's alternative request to re-open the bidding. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
However, because of "some ambiguity" in the court's prior order in regard to the receiver's authority to accept an offer structured as a stock redemption, Justice Driscoll grants the receiver's alternative request to re-open the bidding. [read post]