Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 2441 - 2460 of 24,106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
Netflix streams Rick and Morty and Star Trek: Discovery in the United Kingdom but not in the United States because its licensing contract requires such geographical differentiation to confirm with underlying copyright law.[11] For similar reasons, Amazon requires publishers of e-books to specify the countries where they own publishing rights, and it allows sales only to those countries.[12] Google likewise removes certain pages from its search results when ordered to do so… [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
Further complicating the issue is the fact that, in his opinion for the United States Supreme Court in Dist. of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:24 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 22-163Issues: (1) Whether the limits on agency deference announced in Kisor v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sandy began complaining about the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
 . precludes the application of a state statute to commerce that takes place wholly outside of the State's borders, whether or not the commerce has effects within the State," as well as laws for which the "practical effect of the regulation is to control conduct beyond the boundaries of the State. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm by Roger Parloff
A judge today removed a county official from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the hoary post-Civil War provision that bars certain people from holding office if they have “engaged in insurrection” against the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
If former President Trump commingled his personal effects with classified documents belonging to the United States, then that is not a reason to allow him to restrict use of the government's property. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:12 am by Dan Bressler
” In the United States: “Lawyers Fight Bill Forcing Them to Report Suspicious Client Acts” — “Lawyers are pushing back against anti-money laundering legislation that would require them to report suspicious transactions by clients, as banks already must do. [read post]