Search for: "Utter v. Utter"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 2,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
Thish was evident in the Byrne v Minister for Finance case, where the Supreme Court eschewed any excessively literalist approach to the existing article 35.5, privileging the purpose and value of the literal rule. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
But you'll rarely find another oral argument as philosophical than the one just completed in Baze v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
While the White House said he did apologize for the utterance, which infuriated Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Biden himself said in a CNN interview yesterday that he “clarified” what he said but did not recant the remarks. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:01 pm
Charney v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
This Part will also examine the promise that the Supreme Court made in R v Ahmad that trial judges would stay proceedings before allowing a trial that was unfair because of non-disclosure due to national security confidentiality rulings by the Federal Court. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
By Sophia Williams From 1933 to 1945, during the Nazi party’s rise to power, the Nazis looted, confiscated, or involuntarily transferred more than half a million artworks owned by Jewish art collectors and other victims.[1] Following Nazi party looting before and after World War II, thousands of artworks ended up in museum collections around the world, including in New York, and remain there today.[2] A recent act passed in August 2022 “to amend the education law, in relation to notice… [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Serbia and Croatia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:25 am
Wade and Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm
Dear Readers:The following case is quite instructional. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:04 pm
” Distinguishing State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
It was on this very blog that Mark Tushnet (alas, prematurely) declared victory and called for an unrestrained pursuit of left politics through constitutional law a mere matter of months before Donald Trump began his utter transformation of the courts into an instrument of reaction. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:40 am
These utterances by Trump (as alleged by Hutchinson) were not political speech. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Researching whether the persons responsible for Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment thought the president was an officer of the United States is a bit like researching whether George Washington had five fingers on his right hand. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
His was the first systematic counterinsurgency operation of the Iraq War—conducted, as Fred Kaplan observes in The Insurgents, “with total independence from headquarters”—at a time when the mere utterance of the “i-word” invited opprobrium. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
In the three months since Russia began its war of aggression, the character of the country has been changing before our eyes. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
The practices that the Eleventh Circuit condemned in Engle Cases are like Gresham’s law gone wild, disadvantaging ethical plaintiffs’ firms (no, that’s not an oxymoron), not to mention defendants.Engle involved hundreds of cases (you’ll see why it’s difficult to describe them as “plaintiffs” in a moment), filed in the aftermath of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Engle v. [read post]
