Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 14,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2025, 3:28 pm
The solicitor general is the government’s top lawyer in the Supreme Court, sometimes referred to as the “tenth justice” because of respect that the court has for the lawyers in the solicitor general’s office and the respect that the justices give to that office. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
While some, such as Security Minister Ben Wallace, argue that Tuesday’s ruling in SSHD v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:08 am
Supreme Court to Hear Pedersen DOMA Challenge Today, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) asked the Supreme Court to review Pedersen v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:36 am
Court of Appeals for the 6thCircuit 2012).Lange v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Calvao v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Although some have argued that Dookhan’s dry-labbing demonstrates the necessity of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
Food and Drug Administration overstepped its authority by expanding access to the abortion pill mifepristone, such as by allowing the drug to be dispensed without in-person clinical visits.Access to mifepristone has become particularly important after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:10 am
In a unanimous decision, the Court held in Muldrow v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner commenced the instant Article 78 proceeding to review the Executive Director's determination.* The Appellate Division, citing Ippolito v TJC Dev., LLC, 83 AD3d 57, ruled that the ALJ properly granted the Justice Center's motion to preclude Petitioner from relitigating the issues of whether she had a duty and breached her duty to provide adequate medical care to the Service Recipient as "The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner commenced the instant Article 78 proceeding to review the Executive Director's determination.* The Appellate Division, citing Ippolito v TJC Dev., LLC, 83 AD3d 57, ruled that the ALJ properly granted the Justice Center's motion to preclude Petitioner from relitigating the issues of whether she had a duty and breached her duty to provide adequate medical care to the Service Recipient as "The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
The court's January 15 opinion in Ralph v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:56 am
Miller submitted the matter to Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation (OFIR), which agreed with BCBSM decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:27 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court called for the views of the Solicitor General about a certiorari petition filed in Golden Gate Restaurant Association v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
In other news: Speaking of the Supreme Court . . . the Court issued its opinion in Paroline v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Relations Bd., 6 NY3d 563and Matter of Town of Wallkill v Civil Serv. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:42 pm
The Court declined to follow an earlier decision of Division One of the First District, Page v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm
Second, ALJ tasks, which the Court in Lucia described as judge-like for purposes of officer status, remain subject to SEC rules for administrative proceedings. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
Border Patrol officer. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
He also quoted a lovely passage from Lord Hoffmann's speech in Kirin-Amgen:The courts of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Germany certainly discourage, if they do not actually prohibit, use of the patent office file in aid of construction. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm
The legislative intent of this statute is that courts should give deference to the USPTO as an administrative body. [read post]
