Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 2461 - 2480 of 5,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 2:12 am
In the present report, the Working Group suggests a range of measures that States could take to operationalize the call to take additional steps with regard to State-owned enterprises, by building on existing international guidance and national practices related to the corporate governance of those enterprises. (2016 WG Report, p.1)The Press Release announcing the 2016 WG Report also noted that the "Working Group will also lead discussions on SOEs at the annual UN Forum on Business and… [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 6:52 am by Tom Zagorsky
In Regulatory Notice 16-37, FINRA points out that under the CAB Rules, a CAB would still be permitted to solicit institutional investors to invest in a 3(c)(1) private fund, despite that fund having issued shares to persons who do not meet the definition of “institutional investor” under CAB Rule 016(i), so long as the CAB does not solicit, offer, act as a placement agent or receive compensation in connection with the sale of shares to any person who is not an… [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 3:58 am by Mathew Alderson and Grace Yang
 The newly enacted Law does not differ markedly from the earlier draft. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by Chris Mirasola
It is set to go into effect on June 1, 2017. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Regardless of efficiency or workload concerns, the PTO’s rulemaking authority “does not include a power to revise clear statutory terms. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:37 am by Doorey
 The book does not follow the usual dichotomy of legal texts in the field. [read post]
For CY 2017, CMS proposed 25 additional C-APCs to add to the existing 37 C-APCs, including a C-PAC for Bone Marrow Transplants. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 12:29 am
In particular, three main questions come to my mind once again.1) A deprivation of rights? [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:57 pm by Kent Scheidegger
37%      Yes (1)45         No (2)18         Undecided/Don't Know (8)Comparing the crosstabs of the two propositions produces a few head-scratchers. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
The full opinion of Lord Brodie:HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY [2016] HCJAC 93 HCA/2016-24/XJNOTE BY LORD BRODIE in BILL OF SUSPENSION by CLYDE AND CO (SCOTLAND) LLP Complainers;against THE PROCURATOR FISCAL, EDINBURGH Respondent:Complainers:  Smith QC; Clyde & CoRespondent:  No appearance22 July 2016[1]        The complainers in this bill of suspension are a limited liability partnership, being solicitors with a place of business at Albany House,… [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
It was not until June 17, 2014 (almost 37 years later) that this patent was granted (source).link: http://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/10/17/a-patent-for-the-controversial-impossible-quantum-space-engine-em-drive-was-just-made-public/ [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
And, there is nothing here that would meet the high threshold of s. 1 jursidiction. [read post]