Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Virginia action consolidated Bayer’s claims under Lanham Act Section 43(a)(1)(A) (infringement of an unregistered trade mark) and Section 43(a)(1)(B) false advertising, as well as related state claims. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 2:25 pm
The Board should exercise caution before advising parties that it does not wish to hear relevant evidence that the Board considers uninteresting or unhelpful. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:58 am
The court found that Bayer lacked standing under §43(a)(1)(A) and (B) under Lexmark. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
Sander Greenland is one of the few academics, who has served as an expert witness, who has written post-mortems of his involvement in various litigations[1]. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
Sander Greenland is one of the few academics, who has served as an expert witness, who has written post-mortems of his involvement in various litigations[1]. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:42 pm
It does not determine priority of liability Inter se. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Q: Does estoppel help here? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
That’s not so much an issue of §43(a)(1)(A) versus (B)—use of deceptive TM might count as false advertising—so not even a right to use? [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:20 am
I wonder what in-line linking does to all of this. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
” The CFPB does not propose to amend the definition of an “underserved” area, having concluded that the proposed amendment to “rural” should sufficiently allay any concerns regarding availability of the relevant exemptions. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:27 am
Here, in grossly-simplified form, is their proposal as it relates to Crimea (pp. 40-43): Although international law does not clearly recognize such a right, Ukraine ought to be entitled to compensation for Russia's annexation of Crimea. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Fortunately, the law does not require such results. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
While this list is not exhaustive, it does give U.S. distributors, and their counsel, something to think about and discuss. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:15 pm
Adding her as a Part 20 Defendant certainly does make for a far more interesting trial. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Complete text of bill is below, but here are the bullet points:Conditions covered - Cancer, AIDS or Parkinson's DiseasePhysician certifies its use.Potency "the specific concentrations of individual cannabinoids that must be present to treat the patient's condition," Limited to a 30-day supply.Dispensaries approved by county commissionFlorida Medical Marijuana - Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawFlorida Senate - 2015 SB 528By Senator… [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 4:55 pm
They were expressions of personal opinion and akin to value judgments [43]. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:00 am
Because of subs. 43(1) of the WSIA, the WSIB cut off his loss of earnings benefits two years after the date of the injury, when he was 65 years old. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Finally, Recital 12 does not endorse the French concept of positive competence-competence. [read post]
