Search for: "Gunning v. Doe"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 5,329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2015, 8:09 am
As explicated at great length in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 11:25 am
"But that exemption does not help plaintiff. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
In Vineberg v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
The motorist claimed to have a gun and said he would shoot the officers if they did not leave him alone. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 2:50 pm
Williamson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:51 pm
(He didn’t have a gun, but they couldn’t have known that.) [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
The final vote in Mullenix v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:17 am
Supreme Court summarily decided Mullenix v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
The second, more permissive, definition eschews actual awareness, but still demands a “high degree” of risk: “(2) where the ‘actor has such knowledge, or reason to know, of the facts, but does not realize or appreciate the high degree of risk involved, although a reasonable man in his position would do so. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 9:49 am
Convictions Numbers Do Not Include Sentencing Enhancements for Guns While down, federal weapons convictions data does not include the penalty enhancements defendants received under the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:20 am
While plaintiff would not be able to sue under this Act, that does not mean he can sue the government under Bivens. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
§ 922(g)(9), prohibiting gun possession by persons convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Abramski v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Sharing does not have to involve firing a gun. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
It might not have been Jarndyce v. [read post]
[David Kopel] How Everytown’s background check law impedes firearms safety training and self-defense
2 Nov 2015, 4:52 pm
(D.C. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:01 am
(Note there is some oversimplification below; for instance, the rules are different when the defender is actually the initial aggressor, for instance if D attacks V, V fights back, and then D kills V in “self-defense. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Supreme Court took up the "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" question in Voisine v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
Rex v. [read post]
