Search for: "In Re Ray" Results 2461 - 2480 of 3,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2010, 9:51 am by Joel Johnson Gizmodo
If you’re lucky, it might even be a picture of you or your family. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Kashmir Hill
And some frequent flyers fear the radiation risks that come with being X-rayed on a regular basis.A privacy civil rights group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, is hoping to stay the scans with a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security…EPIC filed an emergency stay earlier this year trying to immediately halt the use of the scanners. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:30 am by bteam
  The heat from the sun’s rays can keep your classroom warm. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:27 am by Blogger Bob
People are asking if they need to come out of bags prior to X-ray screening since they’re smaller. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:49 am by Family Law Attorneys
Dukes, we're not holding you in jail because we like to see you in an orange jumpsuit. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:15 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Well, you couldn't be an Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney, because we're required to file our bankruptcy cases electronically. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:06 am by Gritsforbreakfast
So Republican voters swept 22 Democrats out of the Texas House of Representatives, and unlike in Washington where Republicans realize they're still relatively unpopular, Texas conservatives are taking the transformation for a mandate.But is there a mandate on criminal justice? [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Stringer to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood on Re-Appropriation of ARC Tunnel Funding to Other Regional Transportation Projects Late last week, Manhattan Borough President Scott M. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Joanna Herzik
While you're there, consider adding a law firm link too. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
When Clint Eastwood wants you dead, you're dead. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am by The Legal Blog
Ranjit Kumar referred to Section 137 of the Indian Evidence Act, that defines "examination-in- chief", "cross-examination" and "re-examination" and on that basis sought to argue that the word "examine" occurring in Section 145(2) must be construed to mean all the three kinds of examination of a witness. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew W. Homann
 According to a recent study, two dentists will reach the same conclusion when looking at an identical x-ray only about half the time. [read post]