Search for: "Mark" Results 2461 - 2480 of 151,722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The trouble with registering a set of initials as a trade mark is that sometimes they stand for something. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am by Julius Stobbs (Stobbs IP)
However, In Arsenal, the ECJ (as it then was) stated that the exclusive rights granted to a trade mark proprietor are “… to enable the trade mark proprietor to protect his specific interests as proprietor, that is, to ensure that the trade mark can fulfil its functions. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:38 am
In keeping with INTA and its focus on trade marks, permit me to pose the following question: Does a trade mark have to be truthful? [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:24 am by Diane Marie Amann
This one especially caught the eye because of the markings accompanied by years. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:59 am by Thomas Valenti
FREE Webcast Event: Young Leaders Mark the International Day of the Girl Child Tuesday, Oct 11, 2016 – 1:30pmESThttp://ow.ly/bUgG3053LG0Filed under: Children's Rights, Conflict, Current Affairs, Women [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:59 am by Thomas Valenti
FREE Webcast Event: Young Leaders Mark the International Day of the Girl Child Tuesday, Oct 11, 2016 – 1:30pmESThttp://ow.ly/bUgG3053LG0Filed under: Children's Rights, Conflict, Current Affairs, Women [read post]
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
Account of profits in trade mark infringement and passing off cases? [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As for the internet claims, NG argued that the claim wasn’t plausible because, when a product carries both proper and false patent markings, a plaintiff must show specifically that the falsely marked patents caused it harm, and that it definitely practiced one patent, the ‘999. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:04 pm
Say that you have Word configured to insert quotation marks as curly rather than just normal typewriter-like straight marks (which correspond to the ASCII quotation characters). [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
The blogosphere has a couple of mentions about an article on the AppleInsider that points to a recent Apple trade-mark application for "iPhone" in a "Far Eastern" trade-mark office as evidence that Apple is in the final stages of development... [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:39 am
FrAUDits - fraudulent US trade mark declarationsMartineau"A trade mark is registered for only a specified range of relevant goods and services. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:09 pm
MARK STEYN: "Mark Hemingway is right to say that free speech in Canada 'does not exist in any meaningful way'. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:44 am
  There was no dispute at trial that C=Holdings owned the registrations for the Commodore marks, and that another subsidiary of Asiarim had previously been licensed to use the marks. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:50 am
The hearing officer had heard oppositions by Société des Produits Nestlé ("Nestlé") to the following trade mark [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:21 pm
" 05/28/2009 By Linda Thomson Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff (Contact) has attacked a Canadian professor's recent contention that teenagers should not face child pornography charges for electronically sending nude pictures of themselves to others. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 9:22 pm by Gene Quinn
In part 1 of my interview with Mark Lemley we discussed whether the Supreme Court will take the i4i v. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 2:28 pm
Author Anthony Appleyard Licence  CC BY-SA 3.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsA Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Zacaroli) Puma SE v Nike Innovate CV [2021] EWHC 1438In Trade Marks - Equisafety v Battle Hayward and Bower 7 Jan 2021 IP Northwest, I discussed Mr Nicholas Caddick QC's judgment in Equisafety Ltd v Battle, Hayward and Bower, Ltd and another [2021] EWHC 3296 (IPEC) (8 Dec 2021) where [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
While the Federal Circuit agreed that Chung directly infringed, it held that the court erred in awarding damages for the sales of infringing products prior to commencement of the case, which represents the date Chung received actual notice of the ’284 patent under the patent marking requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]