Search for: "Matter of Thomas J."
Results 2461 - 2480
of 2,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
Meanwhile, the law would immediately remake the voting membership of the Supreme Court from a 6 to 3 moderate, libertarian, and conservative Republican-appointed majority, into a Supreme Court with a 6 to 3 Progressive Democratic-appointed majority, and three Republican-appointed members without a vote on cases before the Supreme Court: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 12:08 pm
Facebook, a split Third Circuit panel (in an opinion by Judge Thomas Hardiman, joined by Judge Peter Phipps) said the case could go forward; there is now a circuit split on the subject, so it's possible that the Supreme Court will take the matter up. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
It would appear that parties expected him to take these two matters into account in any award. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
The dissent pointed out that, “[j]ust like the inevitable discovery exception rejected in Winterstein and the good faith exception rejected in Afana, this attenuation exception allows illegally obtained evidence to be admitted. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
Though no Justice joined this part of the opinion, the four dissenting Justices—Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito—agreed with Part III-A in a separate opinion. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 2:46 pm
Given the State closure order's lack of narrow tailoring, we cannot say that, as a matter of law, it survives such scrutiny…. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
Judge Thomas J. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Aukerman, et al Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitDAMON J. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Thomas & Betts Corp., reached the exact opposite conclusion. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Billion Dollar Fix for Free - http://bit.ly/zD4RXW (Craig Ball) A Practical Guide To Responding To Government Investigations - bit.ly/zS0diw (Roderick Thomas, Mark Sweet) A Good eDiscovery Team: eDiscovery Lawyers – Part II - bit.ly/AwOmmY (Dennis Kiker) All’s “Well” for Halliburton: No Sanctions Result from BP’s Spoliation Claims | Cozen O’Connor… [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
I intend to ensure that her wishes and feelings are taken careful notice of and taken into account when I come to dispose of this matter finally in early April, and I shall bear in mind what she says, but I also note that her wishes and feelings fluctuate from time to time. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have this article out in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Davidoff & Ors v (i) Dhir Doshi and (ii) Thomas Govan [Claim No. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
Maintained by two editors – Wendy Johnson Lario and Kristine J. [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:41 pm
The NSL authorizes the Hong Kong chief executive to appoint incumbent judges to handle national security cases for a term of one year and requires the judges’ removal if they are deemed to be a threat to national security, the criteria for which are unspecified in the law.[10] The short appointment term and the lack of removal criteria are at odds with principles of judicial independence: The International Bar Association’s Minimum Standards of Judicial Independence provide that … [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
And what does it matter if the defendant’s conduct matched the predicate crime regardless of the technical details of the conviction? [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Now it seems to me that there is no First Amendment exception for speech that the judge views as being "born out of a vendetta," or even as "seeking to cause mental distress"; but even to the extent there are exceptions for, say, defamation, or true threats, or perhaps even speech on matters of private concern that's "extreme and outrageous" and intended to cause severe emotional distress, that can't justify an overbroad, categorical "shall… [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
The U.S. government’s petition for writ of certiorari in the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
Read more » The Supreme Court’s Gun Decision Will Lead To More Violent Crime by Professor John J. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
