Search for: "Pool v. State" Results 2461 - 2480 of 2,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am by Kara OBrien
In addition, Dodd-Frank prohibits an adviser from registering with the SEC under the Advisers Act if it (a) has assets under management of less than $100 million, and (b) is required to register in the state in which it maintains its principal office and place of business and, if registered, would be subject to examination by such state. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 1:47 pm
Filed in Stoneridge Investment v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm by Ailyn Cabico
  These advisers should submit a state Form ADV to the relevant state by March 20, 2012 to allow at least 90 days for state approval (California in particular). (2) State-registered Investment Adviser switching to SEC registration. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
21 May 2014, 12:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It also creates a pool of at least five people capable of serving in this capacity. [read post]