Search for: "Stanford Law Review" Results 2461 - 2480 of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Kalvis Golde
Briefly: At the Stanford Law Review, Thomas Ward Frampton urges a second look at Justice Clarence Thomas’ controversial dissent in Flowers v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:11 pm
"IPBiz thought the Stanford Law Review was the breeding ground for hoaxes, like Gary Boone as the inventor of the integrated circuit... [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 10:24 am by jlwallace
The author is a First Women, herself, having served as the first director of the Public Defender Service in Washington D.C. and appointed as the first woman  to Stanford Law School’s regular faculty. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 2:15 am
The idea of using DNA from offenders to help catch their relatives is disconcerting, says Stanford law Prof. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 2:05 am
Lemley had earlier written in the Stanford Law Review that Gary Boone was credited with the invention of the integrated circuit, in an attempt to illustrate a story about patent thickets using an account of history that never actually happened. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:33 pm
  As I suggested in a recent post, as well as in a recent Stanford Law Review article, I think an offense/offender distinction can be very illuminating for sorting through a lot of post-Booker issues. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
And that puppy is forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
This Court should grant certiorari to review the meaning of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm by Daphne Keller
It builds on the much deeper analysis in Dolphins in the Net, my Stanford CIS White Paper about the Glawischnig-Piesczek AG Opinion. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by Dennis Crouch
This decision is important for several reasons: Now, any major or complex asset purchase or corporate reorganization must be reviewed by someone familiar with Federal Circuit Patent Transfer Law in order to ensure that the patent portion of the transfer is done in accordance with federal law. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:16 am by Luke Green
Prior to Duke, he taught at the law schools of Boston University, the University of San Francisco, the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, and Stanford. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:07 am by Rick Pildes
The California Law Review is publishing all of this commentary, along with the Jorde Lecture article. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:45 am by Dennis Crouch
However, the PTAB, which intensely reviews challenged patents, appears to cite NPL even more than EPO examiners do. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:40 am
Berkeley "Vacant Offices in the Administrative State:  Delays in Filling Top Executive Agency Positions, 1977-2005" Daniel Ho, Stanford University, and Kevin Quinn, Harvard University "The Empirical Dimensions of the Standing Doctrine and Judicial Voting" Stephanie Lindquist, University of Texas, and Pamela Corley, Vanderbilt University "Strategies of Judicial Review" Closing Reception 5:00 - 7:00 [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Aila Hoss
” This responsibility is based on history, treaties, case law, and legislation. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:15 am by gstasiewicz
S147999 (CA Supreme Court) accessed March 23, 2010. 2 See Liu Goodwin, “Rethinking Constitutional Welfare Rights,” Stanford Law Review, November 2008 accessed March 23, 2010. 3See Liu Goodwin, “The meaning of Brown vs. the Board,” Los Angeles Times, December 25, 2006 accessed March 23, 2010. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Katherine Rohde
Fisher argues in an article for the Journal of Health Care Law and Policy. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by Ray Dowd
The court rejected the defendant's fair use defense with the following explanation:[A] reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:55 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 26th and Thursday 27th October, the court will hear the case In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), on appeal from [2020] NICA 26. [read post]