Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 2461 - 2480
of 15,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm
§112(b). [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:29 am
” State of California v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:54 am
In addition to direct infringement and use of a patented process, Patent Act section 271(b) states, “Whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 2:51 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
Matter of Potter v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:09 am
This post was authored by Richard C. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:02 am
See NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102(B) (2008) (amended 2010); State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Corp. v New York State Dept. of Labor, 80 AD3d 924 and other court rulings, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that "a petitioner is not aggrieved by an administrative determination made on its default and may not seek to review such a determination. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Corp. v New York State Dept. of Labor, 80 AD3d 924 and other court rulings, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that "a petitioner is not aggrieved by an administrative determination made on its default and may not seek to review such a determination. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am
A court’s review of a PERB's decision is limited to determining if it was affected by an error of law or it was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretionKent v Lefkowitz, 2016 NY Slip Op 03650, Court of Appeals In response to New York State Racing and Wagering Board* (the Racing Board) reducing per diem wages for its seasonal employees* by 25%, the Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO [PEF], the certified collective bargaining representative… [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
* Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe caseThis is about the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) decision in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM [Case C‑396/15 P], another trade mark case upon parallel stripes and shoes. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:23 pm
See R.C.M. 908(b)(4). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
(b).) [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:10 pm
In King v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The United States considered this to be contrary to paragraph 3(c) of Section A of Canada’s TRQ Appendix (“Paragraph 3(c)”) which provides: Canada shall allocate its TRQs each quota year to eligible applicants. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
The court enjoined implementation and enforcement of Sections 2(a), (b), (c), (e), (g) and (h) of President Trump’s September 24 executive order—the sections that indefinitely ban immigration from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Chad—before they were supposed to go into effect on October 18. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
LEXIS 97766, CV-08-267-B-W (D. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
§ 6-103(b)]; and (2) the exercise of jurisdiction must comport with the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am
Liveasay, 437 U.S. 463, 476 (1978) (“[c]ertification of a large class may so increase the defendant’s potential damages liability and litigation costs that he may find it economically prudent to settle and to abandon a meritorious defense”); Newton v. [read post]
