Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 40,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of 495 Estates v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 2:24 am
Since the case of Radmacher v Granatino in 2010, pre-nuptial agreements are viewed with the presumption that the parties entered into it wishing to be bound by it. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 2:26 pm
See Marrache v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:52 am
” (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am
Buchanan One of the safest bets in recent years was that Republicans would conveniently drop the pretense that they believe in states' rights as soon as their manufactured Supreme Court super-majority handed them their long-sought repeal of Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:36 am
Hansard reported a debate on the Bill on 3 February 2023, in which Maria Caulfield (Conservative MP, Lewes) stated that: “There are concerns that the extension of protections against workplace harassment set out in the Bill, while entirely necessary, could inadvertently worsen the chilling effect on free speech in the workplace…” The government’s reasoning is that “employers may take unreasonable or drastic measures to avoid liability for harassment of… [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
In Doe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
Why, they asked, should unelected Justices be empowered to strike down laws passed by the democratically elected Knesset, which represents the will of the people? [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
” The memo has become the basis for Republican lawmakers accusing the FBI of developing an anti-Catholic bias in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases such as Ward v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:13 pm
In the case of Halum et. al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
[1] Stephenson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
In Groff v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
If you happen to know a topic pretty well and look down at Mark’s footnote, every time you discover that Mark has read just the right source. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 2:54 am
The Father shoved her into the wall, hitting her back and head, and she fell down. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
First, his stripped-down, incomplete indictment is consistent with a pattern often seen in New York State courts. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On July 13, 2022, their operator mixing and cooking RTE (redacted) ingredients in an industrial mixer stated that the hummus is typically mixed and cooked for (redacted), but the temperature of the mixture is not checked or recorded, and the equipment does not have a built-in thermometer. [read post]