Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
Given that there is no liability on the defendant, the defendant’s third party claim is dismissed.Read the decision at: Taylor’s Feed & Tires Ltd v Brennan Farms Ltd. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Reassignment of unit work to nonunit employees an improper practice under the Taylor LawMonroe County v New York State Pub. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:19 am
Photo credit: Wikipedia)In X Legacy, LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:49 pm
ComRent International, LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:42 am
Order Reversing Judgment and Sentence November 14, 2013Case Name: TAYLOR FORREST COBB v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
(The DMLP worked with both Miller and Taylor to retain counsel with Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP for tomorrow's hearing.) [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Cassidy v Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of New Rochelle, 37 N.Y.2d 526, Civil Service Law §61(1) grants the appointing authority broad discretion in the selection of candidates, including that of appointing a lower-scoring candidate over a higher-scoring one. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Cassidy v Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of New Rochelle, 37 N.Y.2d 526, Civil Service Law §61(1) grants the appointing authority broad discretion in the selection of candidates, including that of appointing a lower-scoring candidate over a higher-scoring one. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
[v] The U.N. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:05 am
Taylor Gifts, Inc., 421 F.3d 199, 205 (3d Cir. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:28 am
.- Taylor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:57 am
Taylor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:20 am
District Court for Central California ordered the parties in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
The court cited the case of Taylor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
Franck Vecella described the benefits of the ITC even for SEPs, citing the Apple v Samsung dispute. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:27 am
Employees Assn., Inc., 19 NY3d 1066 [2012] and Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of NY, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Employees Assn., Inc., 19 NY3d 1066 [2012] and Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of NY, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:34 am
Yes, a recent case – Taylor v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 12:30 am
Deliberations continue today in State v. [read post]