Search for: "X, Y "
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2015, 9:06 am
"I was definitely a poser as a little kid.... [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:18 am
Said Damon Williams, the University of Wisconsin Vice Provost for Diversity and Climate, at last night's Student Town Hall Meeting. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:38 am
This is the third post in a series on the effectiveness of faith-based prison programs, based on my recent Alabama Law Review article, Do Faith-Based Prisons Work? [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:12 am
Quoting the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Woody Woo, the court explained that “[a] statute that provides that a person must do X in order to achieve Y does not mandate that a person must do X, period. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am
Y is for YouTube, which received a video takedown demand from Canada Post. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:08 am
Employers (and graduates) would be right to be upset if a university said that X had a diploma with honors when, in fact, the university's officials knew that X had never attended the university in question, or perhaps any at all. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
He describes different flavors using a 2 x 2 grid: location on the x-axis with offshore or onshore ("foreign” or “domestic"); ownership on the y-axis with captive or 3rd-party ("owned” or “rented"). [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 8:00 am
The reasoning takes this form: if I may impose X (e.g. imprisonment) upon you, then it follows that I may offer you the choice of X or Y (e.g. your forgoing procreation).There are a number of problems with this formulation. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:28 am
You may even prevent residents of country X from using the mirror website in country Y, by, for example, only excepting credit cards with addresses in the respective country. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
Quoting the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Woody Woo, the court explained that “[a] statute that provides that a person must do X in order to achieve Y does not mandate that a person must do X, period. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:11 am
Mr. x adamantly denies all of the claims asserted by your client. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
As the court explained, a “statute that provides that a person must do X in order to achieve Y does not mandate that a person must do X, period. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 10:51 am
I say 'Not X, Y! [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:30 am
If the offer says you will be employed from x-date to y-date, then you should get paid out for the length of the employment. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 8:13 am
And does it now know that user X with social security and identifying information Y has net worth Z? [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:35 am
If you’ve tentatively agreed on X in the LOI, then you don’t look good attempting to change X to Y in the deal documents. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:33 am
If I represent a client who would be advantaged by the law moving in direction X, that might "corrupt" my academic judgment, leading me to argue in favor of position X when my best objective analysis might lead me to favor Y. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:50 am
They could include:• the child is not to be brought into contact with person X;• the child is only allowed to be in contact with person X if another responsible adult is present;• the child is not allowed to be taken to place Y;• the child is not to be given certain… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:14 pm
Please let me know if I might be of assistance in helping you decode my future works, possibly by revising the text to put it in X-axis/Y-axis graph form. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
In other words, if both x and y are viable options and picking x turns out bad, then such error is a non-actionable judgment call.So did McCain commit political malpractice? [read post]
