Search for: "Young v. United States" Results 2461 - 2480 of 3,676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Alan Neff
It is notable that, as a young DOJ lawyer, Roberts opposed this amendment, which overruled Mobile v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 11:41 am by Schachtman
Personnel records allowed me to establish that Onondaga Pottery had hired a young scientist, Edward Schramm, in the 1930’s, from the United States Bureau of Standards. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:06 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Citizens waiting in the long visa backlogs will be able to use this visa type to enter the United States while their priority date becomes current on the Visa Bulletin. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm by John Elwood
But we’re handicapping that as a hold for another redistricting case out of the same state, McCrory v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
He also showed a wicked sense of humor in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:15 am by Marty Lederman
  Surely that cannot be the view of the United States--yet it is the logical implication of the government’s absurd “affirmative facilitation” argument. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:00 am by Prerna Tara
Do we actually have the same magnitude of a problem in the United States as it is in India? [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, in Handyside v United Kingdom Strasbourg accepted that freedom of speech applies to views which shock and offend and which are heartily disapproved of by the recipient [49]. [read post]