Search for: "AT&T Communications" Results 2481 - 2500 of 127,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in a precedential opinion today affirmed a district court’s judgment that AT&T Mobility LLC did not infringe an inventor’s wireless communications technology patent but held that AT&T had forfeited its chance to prove the patent is invalid on appeal. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in a precedential opinion today affirmed a district court’s judgment that AT&T Mobility LLC did not infringe an inventor’s wireless communications technology patent but held that AT&T had forfeited its chance to prove the patent is invalid on appeal. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 139/87; T 2140/09) the case ought therefore to have been rectified by the department of first instance pursuant to A 109(1). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 9:55 am by ADaigle
  Even attorneys can’t agree on an answer! [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:54 pm by Molly Foley-Healy
 They should be monitored so associations don’t lose money or get embezzled. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:44 pm by Michael Kraut
The problem in many cases is that one or the other partner doesn’t understand the best ways to communicate—and the resulting frustration may erupt into aggression. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
  He noted that he has not seen the federal contractor community at war with the OFCCP to such an extent since the late 1970s. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:20 pm
Technorati Tags: blogging policy, external communications, policy, internal communications, company policies, policies and procedures Share This [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:26 pm by Jim Slaughter
CAVEAT: In terms of legislation, “dead” doesn’t always mean “completely dead. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:34 am by Jim Slaughter
CAVEAT: In terms of legislation, “dead” doesn’t always mean “completely dead. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:45 am by Jim Slaughter
  CAVEAT: legislation referred to as “dead” doesn’t always mean “completely dead. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:00 pm
Earlier this month, AT&T declared that the company would press ahead in its bid to beat a Department of Justice lawsuit against the merger, despite a hyper-negative Federal Communications Commission report on the proposed buyout. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
In the AG's view Article 14 doesn't apply where a provider communicates to the public its ‘own’ content, but does apply on the other hand when the content communicated was provided by the users of its service. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
In the AG's view Article 14 doesn't apply where a provider communicates to the public its ‘own’ content, but does apply on the other hand when the content communicated was provided by the users of its service. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
In the AG's view Article 14 doesn't apply where a provider communicates to the public its ‘own’ content, but does apply on the other hand when the content communicated was provided by the users of its service. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
In the AG's view Article 14 doesn't apply where a provider communicates to the public its ‘own’ content, but does apply on the other hand when the content communicated was provided by the users of its service. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 8:16 am by IntLawGrrls
compiles interesting vacancy notices, as follows: ►Applications are welcome from candidates for two positions: a Joint Research Fellow, who will focus on researching legal responses to violent extremism and terrorism (start date April 1, 2023) and a Communications and PR Intern, who will assist with communications and social media strategies for a wide variety of events and publications (start date February 1, 2023). ► Please click here for more details,… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In a recent post I have reported T 146/07 where the Board deemed anonymous third party observations not to have been filed. [read post]