Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 2481 - 2500 of 29,812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2022, 8:51 pm by Javier Dominguez
By Alissa Del Riego (May 11, 2022, 5:56 PM EDT) Alissa Del RiegoI started my law career at a large multinational law firm representing corporate clients, and officers and directors defending shareholder derivative claims. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
If a plaintiff sues a defendant alleging sexual assault, the defendant will generally be named, even though that too would publicize the allegations of conduct that is criminal as well as tortious. [read post]
11 May 2022, 6:50 am by Edward J. Loya, Jr.
A California Superior Court Judge in Orange County granted an attorneys’ fees award in the amount of $5.8 million to defendant Landmark Event Staffing Services, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
As an initial matter, because it is Netflix, the publicly named criminal defendant, seeking disclosure here, the first and fifth reasons are inapplicable. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Virginia Squires Basketball, 468 F.2d 1064 (2d Cir. 1972), the Second Circuit said the FAA exclusion is limited to workers involved in the transportation industry. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
  RUSSIA, UKRAINE – MARIUPOL The commanders of the Ukrainian forces holding out against Russian troops in the Azovstal plant in Mariupol have lashed out at the government in Kyiv for not doing enough to help them defend the city. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
See, e.g., Powell, 65 N.C. at 709 (defendant not charged with any prior crime); Worthy, 63 N.C. at 203 (defendant not charged with any crime); In re Tate, 63 N.C. 308 (1869) (defendant not charged with any crime); Gerard N. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:51 am by Eugene Volokh
By way of recapitulation, … [i]f the defendant bases his expression of a derogatory opinion of the plaintiff on his own statement of facts that are [true], he is not subject to liability for the factual statement—nor for the expression of opinion, so long as it does not reasonably indicate an assertion of the existence of other, defamatory, facts that would justify the forming of the opinion. [read post]
5 May 2022, 6:39 am by Seyfarth Shaw
Simon, 978 F.3d 1051, 1059 (8th Cir. 2020), the District court explained that while no single factor of the TRO analysis is determinative, the “probability of success factor is the most significant. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:11 am by SHG
Co., 18 F.4th 806, 821 (5th Cir. 2021) (Ho, J., concurring) (same). [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:37 pm
Experian Holdings, Inc. (9th Cir. 2020) 978 F.3d 1082, 1086 [“notice—actual, inquiry, or constructive—is the touchstone for assent to a contract”].) [read post]