Search for: "In Re German"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 4,384
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2013, 10:46 am
The process for the RE'922 patent has just begun, so it probably won't be definitively invalid until early 2018 or later. [read post]
8 May 2013, 2:25 pm
The expert will work for 18 working days between May and June 2013 and travel to Minsk to deliver a lecture at the Institute of Re-training and Upgrading Qualification of Judges, Prosecutors and Legal Professionals. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
The use of the sign in correspondence between the applicant and the German patent and trade mark office, in relation to an application for registration of the word sign 'macros', was deemed insufficient to prove use in the course of trade. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:19 am
You’re next, buddy. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am
Sets out a four part test for when compelled speech can’t be allowed: chilling speech; distorting speech (introducing falsehoods or misleadingness; it might not be clear it’s gov’t speech; compelling professional speech is commandeering professional credibility in order to have an impact on the speech market); autonomy of listeners—paternalism or exploitation of cognitive limitations to work our biases; gov’ts are allowed to be paternalistic if… [read post]
2 May 2013, 6:12 am
We’re hardly alone. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:14 am
If the German insurance industry would not have simply had assumed the American designation and had instead rather taken the German two-tier board system into account, the German product designation more precisely had better been labeled as Insurance for Supervisory and Executive Board Members – S&E rather than D&O Insurance. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:09 am
If you’re affiliated with one of the program sponsors, have received a mailing about the conference or read this blog, select the $49 discount rate for co-sponsoring organizations when you RSVP. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:33 am
If we face facts, neither the German decision nor ReDigi bring us any legal surprises – in fact they’re pretty predictable given the legal landscapes on both sides of the Atlantic. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:59 am
This is different according to German law. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
Alright, I know what you’re thinking. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 2:46 pm
I think in the near future they’re going to increase the floating band even further. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:57 am
At page 11, Ex parte Braeken, 54 USPQ2d 1110 (BPAI 1999) , is cited.At page 14, Sakraida, 425 US 273, 282 is cited.At page 15, the matter of "unexpected results" is discussed with citation to In re Klosak 455 F.2d 1077, 1080 (CCPA 1972)andto McClain v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
This time,the Bundesgerichtshof noted that the outcome of the second appeal turned on the interpretation of Article 15(1) of Regulation 40/94 [which was repealed and re-enacted as Regulation 207/2009 over four years ago, but never mind]. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Last month, the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
| Canadian artists hoping royalty regime will be in federal budget http://ow.ly/iWShY Alert re phishing scam – email pretending to be Canada Revenue Agency advising email recipient is eligible for a tax refund. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
| Canadian artists hoping royalty regime will be in federal budget http://ow.ly/iWShY Alert re phishing scam – email pretending to be Canada Revenue Agency advising email recipient is eligible for a tax refund. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 2:28 pm
A petition for re-hearing was filed by the Association; the appellate court denied the Association’s petition and the case headed to the Illinois Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 10:48 am
Ted Sichelman: if there's no jury right, should we look at the German bifurcation system? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
EU allows hybrid systems, like the German one, as well as the Danish system that acknowledges rights through use only. [read post]
