Search for: "Long v State" Results 2481 - 2500 of 45,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 8:20 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the main opinion for the Court in Timbs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:05 am by INFORRM
  The Supreme Court rejected the first, put forward in Spiller v Joseph ([2010] UKSC 53), which argued for a reform of the law of honest comment in libel so that the defendant’s state of mind would be wholly irrelevant and the test would only depend upon the objective criterion. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In addition, extradition shall not be precluded by the fact that the authorities in the Requested State, after initiating criminal proceedings, have decided to discontinue them, so long as the Requested State’s laws regarding double jeopardy would permit the future reinstitution of such criminal proceedings. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 6:44 am
On March 18, 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Salzberg v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 11:46 pm
Olivares-Rangel, 458 F.3d 1104, 1106 (10th Cir.2006) (interpreting Lopez-Mendoza as merely reiterating long-standing jurisdictional rule), and United States v. [read post]