Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 14,898
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
The three Degraffenreid dissenters suggest that stray dicta from an 1892 case that in no way involved the limits that a state constitution might place on a state legislature in this arena—and casual quotation from this case in a part of the discredited Bush v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am
” Monasky v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
However, “a waiver of sovereign immunity cannot, on its own, extend a court’s subject matter jurisdiction” (Oneida Indian Nation v Phillips, 981 F3d at 171), and “[w]aivers of [sovereignty] are to be strictly construed in favor of the Tribe” (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Chukchansi Economic Dev. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:42 am
The district court denied petitioner’s motion to vacate because the 9thCircuit in US v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:07 am
In 2006, Congress overwhelmingly approved, and President George W. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 2 March, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Tooth. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:57 am
”United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 6:19 pm
Judge Michael W. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 6:06 pm
From today's First Circuit decision in Mullane v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 4:48 pm
IndiaMadrasha Teacher’s Association v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 pm
From the majority opinion in State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:18 am
Wilkinson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:11 am
Bitmanagement Software GmbH v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
A more expansive collection was included in Bernard W. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm
FTC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
” Some self-interest didn’t hurt, either: “[W]e value good relations with local and federal law enforcement,” the spokesperson said. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:53 am
Victor V. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:11 pm
FTC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:08 pm
” See, e.g., State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]