Search for: "STATE v. DEAN"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
DEI efforts, the Trump Administration states, are forms of “illegal and immoral discrimination. [read post]
13 May 2025, 5:01 am
From Judge James Lorenz's order yesterday in S.E. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Dean Skelos, a former Senate majority leader, faces his own criminal trial on November 16. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:07 am
The merits of this issue were not resolved by the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Goldwater v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston Sys. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Had Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm
Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, released its decision in NCAA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) is a standardized test administered by the American-based Law School Admission Council (LSAC), and is one of the most ubiquitous criteria for law school admissions across North America, including at Canadian law schools. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:26 am
The Restaurants According to their complaint, plaintiffs Asaf and Ayelet Berman were invited by their friends, Dean and Maya Jankelowitz, initially to invest seed money for a bistro-style restaurant concept in Manhattan. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:11 pm
See Threadgill v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 11:43 am
From Mastriano v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am
In the past day, the encampment, which sits between John V. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:32 pm
The solution is to create a one-off exception to the exclusionary rule for terrorists who attacked the United States in the past, a one-off return to the rule which prevailed prior to Mapp v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
With OLC in opposition, the President turned to others, including State Department Legal Advisor (and former Yale dean) Harold Koh, who championed the argument that the United States’ relatively low-level involvement in NATO efforts did not constitute “hostilities” under the WPR and therefore was not subject to the 60-day deadline. [read post]
