Search for: "SY" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 6:32 am by Molly DiBianca
In Bay Sys Technologies, LLC, Case 5-CA-36314, the employer initially filed an answer to the Charge, which was brought by former employee, Dontray Tull, but later withdrew it. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:41 am
The court explained that "The doctrine of primary jurisdiction provides that [w]here the courts and an administrative agency have concurrent jurisdiction over a dispute involving issues beyond the conventional experience of judges . . . the court will stay its hand until the agency has applied its expertise to the salient questions," citing Flacke v Onondaga Landfill Sys., 69 NY2d 35. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:39 am by Eric Barton
Super Sys., Inc., 617 Fed.Appx. 406, 408 (6th Cir. 2015), cert. denied sub nom. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm by Eric
., 818 F.2d 254, 260 (2d Cir.1987) (holding there was likelihood of initial interest confusion “even though defendant's business is transacted in large quantities only with sophisticated oil traders”) with Checkpoint Sys., 269 F.3d at 285 (holding no likelihood of initial interest confusion, in part because purchasers were sophisticated and exercised high degree of care) and Rust Env't & Infrastructure, 131 F.3d at 1217 (holding no likelihood of initial interest… [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:41 am by admin
Howe Institute report – abtract “The Supreme Court will rule on Thursday, October 31, in landmark Competition Act decisions, Pro-Sys v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:40 pm by Steve Davies
Giattina, to KDOW employee Sandy Gruzesky, dated Dec. 21, 2009, commenting on proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Draft Permit for Premier Elkhorn Coal Company E-mail from EPA employee Chris Thomas to KDOW employe Sandy Gruzesky, dated Dec. 21, 2009 E-mail from EPA employe Sharmin Syed, to KDOW employee R. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 6:41 am by Schachtman
Bansal, 663 F.3d 634 (3d Cir. 2011);  Keystone Retaining Wall Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 11:00 am by Daniel S. Blynn
To allow for interstate application of the FTSA would violate the Commerce and Dormant Commerce Clauses (another good argument to make and supported by a 2009 Southern District of Florida decision finding that Florida’s Caller ID Anti-Spoofing Act violated such constitutional provisions (TelTech Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:36 pm
Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 102 Ohio St.3d 192, 2004-Ohio-2365, 808 N.E.2d 381.Fortunately, the current workers’ compensation subrogation statute did not suffer the same fate. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sys., 235 AD2d 979, 980 [1997]; see also Zanani v Schvimmer, 50 AD3d 445, 446 [2008]). [read post]