Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, and by Justice Scalia in all except Parts III and V–B–1.To discuss the case, we have Kristen Osenga, who is a Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, and by Justice Scalia in all except Parts III and V–B–1.To discuss the case, we have Kristen Osenga, who is a Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
United States, the now-famous GPS case where a unanimous Court overturned years of practice by holding that placing a GPS monitor on the underside of a suspect's vehicle is a "search" that must be supported by a warrant. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:57 am
Justice Ginsberg stated that she would "resist a holding out of accord with the firm position the United States has taken on exhaustion in international negotiations." [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
Major blog congratulations go to Miami PD Howard Blumberg who notched a win in the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday with the decision in Florida v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
The lawyers for both sides made the list of top 100 influential lawyers in the United States by the National Law Journal. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
Riegel v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:39 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:53 am
Adam Liptak wrote about my favorite exchange of the day: The question for the justices was whether that state law conflicted with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allows voters to register using a federal form that asks, “Are you a citizen of the United States? [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:35 am
The question for the justices was whether that state law conflicted with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allows voters to register using a federal form that asks, “Are you a citizen of the United States? [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
United States, 295 U. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:46 am
But it would do so without imposing downstream liability on those who purchase and resell in the United States copies that happen to have been manu- factured abroad. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:08 pm
The case was Gideon v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:21 am
United States) the Court often interprets the Bankruptcy Power narrowly, it has almost always accepted arguments from the Office of the United States Trustee. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
