Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 2481 - 2500 of 5,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2024, 11:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed this in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, where the court stated, “While the corporation is ongoing, shares confer no right to its underlying assets. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:37 am
"It's good," he said, "and I agree with your conclusions. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 4:51 pm
  With this ruling, the Court resolved a split in authority, and aligned FEHA requirements with those of the Americans with Disabilities Act, its federal counterpart.What HappenedThe controversy in Green v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Short of a trial on the merits, there could be additional motions for summary judgment, but there might also be a settlement.POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT REVIEW  Barring a prompt resolution of the dispute by settlement, however, there is a good chance that the case will first be taken to the Texas Supreme Court, and if the high court agrees to hear it, it is likely that one or more of the legal issues might get decided differently by the court that has the last word on matters of Texas… [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 8:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
It read, in part: That the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized to issue, on the credit of the United States, one hundred and fifty millions of dollars of United States notes, not bearing interest, payable to bearer, at the Treasury of the United States, and of Denominations, such denominations as he may deem expedient, not less than five dollars each. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
”[16] A federal officer must actually act pursuant to federal authority, and their conduct must bear an objectively reasonable relationship to achieving a federal goal. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:38 am by SHG
And this was, without a doubt, a critically important Fourth Amendment case, Birchfield v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am by Daniel Shaviro
 He never sought to refute Saul Cornell's influential claim that the right to bear arms in 1791 was the right to be part of a state militia. [read post]