Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 3,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:29 am
In Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
Blum next invites Stephen Carter to address the audience. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 11:45 am
In Valentine v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
United States (1962). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:28 pm
Here they are: “This is a Stephen King novel for elections junkies. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
” At CNN, Joan Biskupic reports that in “a lively Zoom chat with students at the United Nations International School,” Justice Stephen Breyer “offer[ed] a glimpse of the justices’ private negotiations against a canvas of how the law develops in America. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:12 am
United States, about threats on Facebook – the Justices themselves took with enthusiasm to the first case. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:14 am
Endorsements “This is a Stephen King novel for election junkies. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
One side effect of the majority opinion was its negative view of an 1872 decision, United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
Here is a brief breakdown of this week's 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Christopher v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:31 am
This is the first appellate case after U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm
United States, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in the main opinion that the 2002 law was so broadly worded that it “covers the waterfront, including fish from the sea. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:26 pm
Making a non-legal argument, the reply said that "the reputation of the United States is on the line in these novel and untested trials. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm
The defendant stated that the crack was not his and that he was holding it for someone else. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
The United States Supreme Court is hearing an intriguing case this week about whether Congress can make it a crime to falsely claim having been awarded a military medal, in a case testing the reach of the Constitution’s free-speech protection. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am
Breyer served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States for nearly three decades. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:01 am
Despite its constitutional provenance and majestic grandeur, the Supreme Court of the United States operates like any other court. [read post]
