Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 2481 - 2500 of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States, US Supreme Court (1/27/14)Criminal LawLong-time drug user Banka died after a binge that included use of heroin purchased from Burrage. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Bethany Berger
The oral argument on Tuesday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Rockland, however, moved to dismiss Clifford’s complaint as barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, citing the dismissal of her claims against it in an earlier federal action she had brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.* Clifford, on the other hand, claimed that her State action should go forward because the Federal District Court had declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her State law… [read post]
27 May 2012, 11:42 am by Madelaine Lane
  The Court remanded the matter to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of this issue in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent holding in Howe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:11 am
The technology at issue, amlodipine besylate tablets, is commercially sold in the United States by Pfizer under the trademark Norvasc ®. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am by Michael C. Dorf
Omit the facts portion of the memo in your answer.Question 3As you know, a House of Representatives select committee charged with investigating the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol has issued subpoenas for records and testimony from various actors, including the Archivist of the United States (as custodian of executive records), former officials in the Trump administration, and informal advisors to the President. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Lisa Ouellette
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Lisa Ouellette
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 3:39 am
  Read comments and post your comment TTABlog comment: The cost-shifting of Rule 2.123(c) was also the subject of the recent precedential decision in United States Postal Service v. [read post]