Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 2481 - 2500 of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2012, 7:46 am by Margot Patterson
The Supreme Court of Canada determined yesterday, in A.B. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by azatty
As the press release begins, “Eight employees from the Office of the United States Attorney, District of Arizona, have been selected as recipients of the 2010 Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Director’s Awards. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:03 am by Russ Bensing
We note such misconduct is certainly of the type to warrant review by Tennessee’s United States Attorney’s Office. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
This is what Jaime tells us:Trademark trolls and trade mark hijacking in CubaThe start of negotiations and eventual opening of commercial relations between Cuba and United States is tempting some individuals to jump at the chance to register US trade marks in order to force trade mark holders to negotiate their entrance into the Cuban market. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm by admin
The decision interpreted the first-sale doctrine, which allows legal owners to resell, lend, or dispose of copyrighted works after purchase, to apply only to works manufactured in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm by admin
The decision interpreted the first-sale doctrine, which allows legal owners to resell, lend, or dispose of copyrighted works after purchase, to apply only to works manufactured in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:40 am by Robert Chesney
The Eleventh Circuit in yesterday’s decision – United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am by Florian Mueller
Ericsson evidentiary hearing (a trial by any other name) in the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) (Presiding Judge: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Monica Bhattacharyya.Here are the minutes of the final trial day in Texas, which was rather short owing to the settlement:Ericsson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Section 3 says the following:No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:18 pm by David McDowell
The March 11, 2013 opinion came in response to three questions certified by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, where the Tyler case was pending. [read post]
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:31 am by Jani
Since its enactment at the cusp of the 21st century, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in the United States has been the subject of discussion within the IP community, practitioners and even the public in general. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:58 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
As a result, two of our clients have been effectively banned from traveling from the United States to be with their families in Ireland and Yemen. [read post]