Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 2481 - 2500 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
Federal Circuit Distinguishes Enfish in New Patent Eligible Subject Matter DecisionThe patentability of computer-implemented inventions has been in doubt in the United States since the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
  Re/Max authorizes thousands of franchisees and independent contractors to use its marks in connection with real estate brokerage services throughout the United States and other countries. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am by Peter Spiro
“It would be made upon the government of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:15 pm
Posner's use of the word "head" instead of "heads" in the following passage from that court's recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:27 am by Russell Beck
Arthur Andersen LLP, closing a loophole that had been opened and expanded by the United States District Courts in California, which had allowed the enforcement of noncompetes in certain circumstances. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:59 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
Tempnology, LLC N/K/A Old Cold LLC, involves this precise question and has made its way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
CARY PRESS,;No 06-CV-6686 (JFB) (ARL);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
This event will focus on the OHIM Community trade mark opposition decision in CANAL + v KABLEPLUS of 13 February 2014, where an opponent was put to proof of use of a mark which was not the basis of his opposition. [read post]