Search for: "United States v. Sessions" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
  The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
It referred to Strasbourg case law, cited in Ladele suggesting that Article 9 “primarily protects the sphere of personal beliefs and religious creeds and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a way which is dictated by such a belief”: C v United Kingdom App 10358/83. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:07 am
Shortly thereafter he was scheduled to begin oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
That panel will be held on 7 March, at the 19th session of the Council, and it will be chaired by South Africa.So the campaign for LGBT human rights is not just about the United States lecturing other nations (and in fact, Hillary Clinton’s speech struck a note of mutual collaboration and respect). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
Any State Party to the present Covenant availing itself of the right of derogation shall immediately inform the other States Parties to the present Covenant, through the intermediary of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, of the provisions from which it has derogated and of the reasons by which it was actuated. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (and 11-5721 – Hill v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:30 am by Monique Altheim
Reding's press conf. on EU #Dataprotection Reform package livestreamed today at 12pm GMT+1 here: ow.ly/8F0S6 #privacy #CPDP2012 # Watch Vivian Reding's Press Conference at the European Commission live here as I will try to live stream it at… http://t.co/whmihIQV # Megaupload takedown reminds us why website terms and conditions can be important http://t.co/LxaQfRc9 # V. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm by Joe Palazzolo
It begins with the memorable scene in the 2010 address where Justice Samuel Alito mouthed the words “not true,” after President Obama ripped the court for its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]