Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 2481 - 2500 of 3,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2011, 2:20 pm by Steve Kalar
” Id.The district court denied the motion; Williams entered a conditional plea to the advertising count.Issue(s): “The sole issue is whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  The New York Court of Appeals will hear oral argument on this question on November 15 in Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm by Giovanna Shay
§ 2254.The district court dismissed Gonzalez’s federal habeas petition as untimely under the one-year AEDPA filing deadline, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
MEYERS, Defendant.;09 Civ. 4412 (GWG);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ;2011 U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:38 am
“Clinically Proven” Help-Baby-Sleep Labeling Could Be DeceptiveThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Johnson & Johnson’s labeling of its baby bath products as “clinically proven” to help babies sleep better could be deceptive and misleading in violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, but a purchaser’s allegations of ascertainable loss were inadequate to establish a cause of action, the federal… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
In the New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on recent criticism of the Court (as well as the federal judiciary more generally) by Republican presidential candidates. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  The Federal Circuit found that the mere visual display was not sufficient to create a public use for purposes of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:40 am by admin
District Court for the Southern District of New York to 11 years in prison—the lengthiest term ever imposed on an individual for insider trading violations (United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Placement of “Patent Pending” Tag Supports Competitor’s False Marking ClaimThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.The placement of “patent pending” label on the bottom of tote bags, next to the seller’s “Optari” label, could constitute false patent marking, the federal district court in Nashville has ruled. [read post]