Search for: "Austin v. State" Results 2501 - 2520 of 2,732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
  Shortly after Section 5 was reauthorized in 2006, its constitutionality was challenged in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
" { The Commission described the inquiry as "asking [Eckhardt] to speculate on why Governor Abbott would involve himself in the City of Austin's tree ordinance. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:05 am by Andrew Voth
Looking more closely at Rader’s opinion, Rader brings us back to the basics by stating that in order to invoke the EMVR: The patented components must be the basis for customer demand for the entire machine including the parts beyond the claimed invention, Fonar Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
On Tuesday, this clash of perceptions returns to the Court, with review of the latest class-action dispute, Tyson Foods v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
(If you're interested in the arguments about the 2006 extension of section 5, there's lots of good scholarship out there, plus a masterful opinion from the D.D.C. last week in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:04 pm by Berin Szoka
FCC General Counsel Austin Schlick’s legal memorandum supporting the “Third Way” makes no mention of the Universal Service Fund. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, DeVillier v. [read post]