Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C" Results 2501 - 2520 of 4,785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 6:42 am by Amy Howe
  Toluse Olorunnipa and Michael C. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 3:17 pm by Linda A. Kerns
Now, parents in Pennsylvania must first notify the other parent of his or her intent to relocate at least sixty days before the proposed relocation (§5337(c)). [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 7:01 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
(s) The developmental stages and needs of the child and the demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to meet the child’s developmental needs. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 8:08 pm by Jon McLaughlin
 Courts will no longer award custody or visitation under this bill. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is axiomatic that an officer may only seize and take into custody an individual when the officer has probable cause to believe that the person has committed a crime. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:40 am by Shamnad Basheer
 On the point of questions of law, like the Supreme Court, the Patna High Court too has made the same mistake that Anup Surendranath has pointed out on this blog – that of conflating the denial of voting rights under s. 62(5) of the 1951 Act and the disqualification of being on an electoral roll under s. 16(1)(c) of the 1950 Act. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The custody rule provides an exception from the custodian requirement for a fund in the case of certain privately offered securities it holds, provided the fund’s financial statements are audited. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm by Nick Robinson
The reasoning is that a person who has no right to vote is disqualified from registering in the electoral rolls (S. 16(1)(c) of RPA), implying that he/she is not an ‘elector’ (S. 2(1)(e) of RPA) – which is one of the qualifications for “being chosen to fill a seat” of the House of the People and a Legislative Assembly of a State (S. 4(d) and 5(c) of RPA).In other words, according to the judgment, if a person is in police… [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 11:14 am by WSLL
Mother also queries: Does this [C]ourt lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal because [Father] failed to file a Notice of Appeal from the district court’s final order disposing of the issues in this case within the allotted time provided by Wyo. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Third, a Nassau County Child Custody Lawyer said that based upon the totality of the circumstances, and in consonance with the court’s ruling in Eschbach v Eschbach (1982), the award of custody to the father herein would certainly serve the best interests of the subject child. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 10:28 am by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Custody Lawyer said the issue in this case is whether the neglect petition pursuant to Family Court Act § 1051(c) and a fact-finding determination should be granted. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:29 am by Stephen Bilkis
It ruled that New York was C's home state and that the court had jurisdiction to entertain A’s custody petition. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:56 am by James P. Yudes, Esq.
  However, our present law clearly recognizes that the custodial duties of a parent are to be factored into the alimony matrix, whereas responsibility for the custodial duties of a parent for children is conspicuously absent from the current pending legislation. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 8:14 am by Gregory Forman
Pursuant to Rule 55(c), SCRCP in order to file an untimely answer and counterclaim after the entry of a default order one must demonstrate “good cause shown. [read post]