Search for: "Dennis Crouch"
Results 2501 - 2520
of 2,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 8:21 am
[An article presented in SSRN by Dennis Crouch was cited in one of the opinions. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:51 am
My background is in patent litigation, and when in practice I often referred to the Patently-O Blog by Dennis Crouch. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 11:28 pm
Dennis Crouch of the Patently-O patent law blog has an interesting post on the case, and he gets special thanks for first reporting on the decision. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am
by Dennis Crouch Functional claim language has long been a mainstay of U.S. patent law. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
— Dennis Crouch Guest post by Nina Mendelson, Following one Supreme Court decision posing dangers for the integrity of all sorts of agency adjudication, the ongoing litigation in Arthrex v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
by Dennis Crouch It is time to pick-up our consideration of Supreme Court patent cases for the 2022-2023 term. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:51 pm
We remand for the court to consider any suchproperly raised non-Rule 12(h)(1)(A) arguments thatMicron has forfeited its venue defense and, if there are nosuch sound arguments, to consider the merits of venueunder § 1400(b).FOOTNOTE: Dennis Crouch at PatentlyO has an interesting take on "controlling" law:Although the court [CAFC] is absolutely correct that its approach is the common-sense approach since we have been operating under the old rule for decades. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
Another way to look at the impact of the AIA starts with the count of the number of US Patents in force, about 2.1 Million according to Professor Dennis Crouch of the University of Missouri School of Law[6]. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
Low Rejection Rate and Lack of Significant File Wrapper Estoppels Dennis Crouch reported (see “Design Patent Rejections” by Dennis Crouch, Patently O’ , January 19, 2010) that during prosecution, 81.6% design patents receive no rejection and only 1.2% are rejected on the basis of prior art, 18.2% are rejected for § 112 or other formality violations. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Well-known Patently-O blogger Professor Dennis Crouch suggests that the different outcomes may be explained by how we think of the “invention. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
Also telling is the citation by Gajarsa in his concurrence of work by Dennis Crouch and Chris Holman showing that few cases have invalidated claims based on written description. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:33 am
Dennis Crouch took issue with the inherency portion of the Millennium decision [ 2017 U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
In light of the above criticisms, one might want to ask, as Patently O's Dennis Crouch does, "Should we Move Toward More Fee Shifting in Patent Cases? [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 3:46 am
”However in this article Dennis Crouch and Robert Merges argue that the law does not require the threshold subject matter eligibility question to be decided in any particular order.I for one believe that in case of absolute exceptions to patentability i.e. exceptions which are not qualified (mathematical method, business method), determination of subject matter eligibility should precede determination of novelty and inventive step. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:51 pm
")For other takes on the argument, see Dennis Crouch at Patently-O, Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog, Ed Lee at Chicago-Kent's ISCOTUS, and Lawrence Hurley for Reuters. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 3:11 pm
A 2010 study by Professor Dennis Crouch revealed that “[f]or the past decade, the allowance rate for design patent applications has remained over 90%”—compared to a 44% allowance rate for utility patents during the same period—and “a prior-art-based rejection rate of only 1.2%. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:32 am
Dennis Crouch has had big impact on patent scholarship, mostly by writing short summaries/items of interest to the academic world. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
At Patently-O, Professor Dennis Crouch, in a post titled “US Patent Applicants Heading to the EPO,” notes that many practitioners believe that the EPO is less restrictive in its application of patent eligible subject matter than the USPTO. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:14 pm
Further down the line, on PatentlyO, Dennis Crouch explains the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling in Kamrava on the patentability of inventions encompassing a human organism here. [read post]
