Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 2501 - 2520 of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2011, 12:02 pm
Those entitled to free legal services are members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, women, children, persons with disability, victims of ethnic violence, industrial workmen, persons in custody, and those whose income does not exceed a level set by the government (currently it is Rs 1 lakh a year in most States). [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Court addressed the following four issues: (1) Is the question of whether the Prime Minister’s advice to the Queen was lawful justiciable in a court of law? [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 pm
The holding in Williams, that the status quo requirement does not apply in cases where there has been no initial collective bargaining agreement, implies that the interest to be protected by the RLA is the agreement between the parties. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
's interpretation was “not contrary to any express Congressional intent. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
The meaning of “treatment” Although s 1 of the Act does not use the word “treatment”, it is clear that the treatment to which s 4 refers is the termination of pregnancy under s 1. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
Counts 1 and 2On April 3, 2013, Austin Koniglio and Adam Quezada were studying together at a Starbucks coffee shop in Rancho Cucamonga. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 12:34 am
The making available and management of an online sharing platform must be therefore considered an act of communication for the purposes of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:14 am
Garcia, 299 Conn. 39 (Supreme Court of Connecticut 2010). [read post]