Search for: "John Doe 2 "
Results 2501 - 2520
of 12,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2020, 4:34 am
If consumers expect them to be there, it is either because they are used decoratively, which the evidence here does not suggest, or it is because they make the products work better. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:41 am
Thus, according to applicant, the evidence does not demonstrate widespread exposure to the surname "Tapio. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 2:48 am
In other words, the standard for proving functionality of a design patent is much higher than that for a trademark.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:15 pm
Read here.The case was heard by the Beijing No.2 Intermediate People's Court on 10th April 2007. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:32 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:40 am
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 9:30 am
” (From Dictionary of Word and Phrase Origins Vol.2, by William and Mary Morris) DOES THAT RING ANY BELLS? [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:30 am
And so the Board reversed the PTO's Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:36 pm
[9] John W. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
John Elwood reviews the relists from the “long conference” … barely. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 12:45 am
John Ward, Jr. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:40 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, The Ninth Vote in the 'Stop the Beach' Case (Oct. 2, 2012) [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:00 am
What Happens if the Attorney Does Not Win? [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
at 2 (dissent). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Petitioner John Doe, a minor, by and through his parents Jack and Jane Doe, seeks “sexual orientation change efforts” (“SOCE”) counseling to treat his “unwanted same-sex attractions. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:02 am
The Board also affirmed an alternative refusal based on Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness and lack of acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
"Significantly, the Appellate Division observed that it is well settled that [1] an employee's displeasure with a work assignment, absent an adverse impact on his or her civil service grade or title, salary or benefits, does not implicate Civil Service Law §75, citing Galatti v County of Dutchess, 64 NY2d 1163, and [2] the assignments of the detectives were within the sole discretion of "the appointing officer. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:49 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
