Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE" Results 2501 - 2520 of 4,606
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2013, 1:37 pm by Matthew David Brozik
A new lawsuit commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York—John Johnson (not an alias) et ano. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Businesses Hard http://t.co/oDCMK7QjxT -> Samsung Requests Retrial in $1B Patent Ruling for Apple http://t.co/4pKHJpEMY5 -> Japanese government considering copyright term extension – Complete Music Update http://t.co/JlAnuAsqjX -> PRISM: The EU must take steps to protect cloud data from US snoopers http://t.co/KE75LoRnG4 -> On copyright levies, printers, plotters and personal computers (VG Wort v Kyocera and others) http://t.co/GHqT1fKR5Y -> Laws with… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 8:33 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Perhaps it was illegal download overload after years of blogging about BU grad and former online music lover Joel Tenenbaum (see "TUOL" posts 5/21/12, 9/19/11, 7/9/10, 8/3/09 & 7/28/09), but we were remiss in not reporting a decision late last month by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:27 am by Terry Hart
This past March, the Supreme Court considered in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/eVtR0AKu4a -> Firms to continue ‘three strikes’ rule against illegal music downloaders http://t.co/JciQy9hwp7 via @IrishTimes -> Border agency drops rule for iPod tax exemption http://t.co/PNTVKQoSXF -> Federal Circuit Gives Software Patents A Boost In Ultramercial v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/eVtR0AKu4a -> Firms to continue ‘three strikes’ rule against illegal music downloaders http://t.co/JciQy9hwp7 via @IrishTimes -> [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]